Beginner's Kit/Etiquette Guide
This file is mainly
intended for newcomers to the newsgroup/mailing list. The
under-signed wrote it, will try to post it regularly, and is of
course open to suggestions and corrections.If you are reading the
newsgroups, go to news.announce.newusers
first, and read the general material there (especially
Emily Postnews' guide to Netiquette). Some of the advice will
duplicated here for extra-emphasis, but it is the best general
introduction to newsgroups.
where am I?
Depending on your personal situation, either reading the Early Music
mailing list (if messages come to you by e-mail) or the newsgroup
rec.music.early (if you are using news
software). If you are in the
latter case, always keep in mind that there are folks who do not enjoy
the benefits of news software, and are reading your posts in a different
format. Also remember that some folks pay for their access to the
wonders of the net.
If you have a choice of method, it is probably better for you to read
the newsgroup than receive the mailing list, which is an imperfect
substitute. Aside from keeping the general news traffic distinct from
your private e-mail, a news software typically provides many bells and
whistles that make reading and responding so much easier. If you pay
for your connection but have a newsreader that downloads to disk, there
is no disadvantage in cost. If you pay but can only read news on-line,
you may want to consider the list instead.
For a long time, the list and the newsgroup were equivalent: an automatic
gateway in Vienna posted all list messages and sent all posts to the list.
With the appearance of "spam" (cf. infra), some list subscribers complained,
and one idiot even threatened to sue Gerhard Gonther, who maintained the
gateway. As a result, since September 1996, Gerhard manually sorts the
traffic between the two, mainly to eliminate spam.
If you get EARLYM-L by e-mail, you probably received
an automatic mailing from the system administrator (the LISTSERV) with
some beginning "lessons" on LISTSERV commands. Other commands allow
you to customize the way you receive messages. For example, you can
adjust the amount of information that comes in headers so that you know
from whose posting you read and whence it came. Another option is to
receive an entire day's postings as a single digest file instead of as
they are posted, a useful option while on vacation. There are many
more options. To get more information on LISTSERV commands, just send
the command
"info refcard"
to listserv@aearn.aco.net. who else is here?
A very diverse bunch of people, academics, professional musicians,
amateur performers, or just music-lovers, on several continents. Regular
and occasional contributors number in the few hundreds, the readership
probably in the thousands, and growing.(It has been suggested that
we have a "bio file" to which people can contribute a paragraph about
themselves, and which would be available for perusal. This doesn't
currently exist, but it may soon).
Is there a FAQ?
Yes. However, it is still under
construction.
what can I do?
Basically four things:
- read other people's posts,
- reply to them by private e-mail,
- reply to the whole group by a post, which is sent everywhere,
- initiate a new thread (i.e., a succession of posts, theoretically
on the same topic).
The general purpose of the newsgroup is to discuss matters
related to Early Music. This can be understood in two ways: Classical
Western music up to a certain date (say, 1750 or 1800), which covers
Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque mainly. The other way is music
performed with an emphasis on authentic instruments, with appropriate
techniques. One generic term is HIP (historically informed
performance). There are H.I. performances of post-1750 works (even
Brahms or Mahler can be HIPed), which is one reason why the boundary
between Early Music and other Classical music is fuzzy. In fact, where
this boundary lies is itself a hot topic of discussion.A FAQ is
currently being written, and it will address those issues in greater
detail than needed here.
Announcements of concerts, new
recordings, new publications, and other "commercial" posts are welcome,
as long as they are clearly related to early music, light on hype, heavy
on info, and posted once. Concert
announcements are encouraged, since many are curious to know what is
going on even in places far away from them; however, it would be useful
to include an indication of geographical location (country or state) in
the subject line.
how should I do it?
What you do via e-mail is your concern. When you post, on the other
hand, this concerns every reader. This newsgroup is not moderated, so
anyone can post anything they want. With a growing readership, the
volume on this group is increasing, and some basic rules might help to
keep it to a manageable level. Here are a few notions of "netiquette",
intended as guidelines to smooth the process, not as a rigidly enforced
code. to post or not to post
new thread
if you are starting a new thread, or asking for information,
remember to pause and consider whether this is the appropriate forum.
Not that you'll be savaged for being in the wrong place, but you may
get back less than expected. Also, if you are asking for info which
is not of general interest, add the phrase "Please reply by e-mail."
As an incentive, you might promise to post a summary.
You should
want to check the newsgroup's archive (cf. infra)
or DejaNews
to check whether the information you are seeking hasn't already been aired.
Check the FAQ as well.
responding
- before responding, read all current articles on the same topic:
someone may have already answered the question or raised the point,
sometimes 5 people have already done so.
- will your message interest only the previous poster? If so,
private e-mail is preferable.
subject line
- if you are responding to a post, the current subject line will be
used automatically; if the discussion is wandering away from the
original topic, change the subject line, but try to leave the first
words of the original subject for those readers who follow threads. Ex:
Re: countertenors
vibrato (was Re: countertenors)
- if you are asking for CD recommendations, try to mention it in
some way in the subject line (e.g., "CD recs"). In fact, we may try
to develop a system of "labels" or key-words. News software have
kill-files which allow users to delete messages whose subject lines
contain certain strings.
One such label has emerged in the past few months. One reader has
made it a habit of posting limericks, inspired by recent comments or
current news. The "label" for limericks is "uncouth," for purely
accidental reasons. If you want to avoid silly limericks, delete all
posts with that word in the subject line. (That reader is not the only
one to post limericks, but his talent and prolificacy have earned him the
title of List Laureate Limericist, or LLL).
- in general, try to be precise and concise: think of those who have
to wade through dozens of mysteriously-labeled messages.
the message itself
- if you are responding, it may be the case that the body of the
message you are responding to will be included automatically,
preceded with a "quote character" like >. The result looks like
this:
In article <***> Claudio Monteverdi writes:
>Prime le parole, doppo la musica.
When the article to which you are responding was already
quoting someone, the result becomes: In article <***> Orlando di Lasso writes:
>In article <***> Claudio Monteverdi writes:
>>Prime le parole, doppo la musica.
>Claudio, you don't know beans about music.
In what follows, readers will presume that text preceded
by one > was written by Orlando, and text preceded by two > by
Claudio.
- try to delete what is not directly relevant to your own message,
and avoid quoting 95 lines of text to add 3 of your own. People
will often indicate that they have made deletions by inserting:
> [text deleted]
> [snip, snip]
> [omitted for brevity]
- do try to make the link with what precedes in the discussion, by
quoting at least a few lines, or summing up the tenor of the previous
message (remember that messages do not arrive in the same order at
all sites, and you may be one of many to post on the same topic).
- keep your line length below 72 or 75 characters. Many screens
only show 80 and will not wrap; furthermore, each time your message
is quoted, it is shifted one (sometimes 2 or 3) character to the
right.
- sign your message: people like to know who they're talking with.
(Readers of the mailing list often do not know who wrote what unless
it is signed, nor can they reply by e-mail rather than post). Many
software will automatically include the contents of a "signature"
file. But keep that signature file under 5 lines: the cutest 25-line
ASCII drawing of a harpsichord tends to wear thin after a while.
tunes
Anything pertaining to Early Music is fair game
for a new topic. What Early Music is, even within the context of
this group, is still under debate. Keep in mind that some topics are
liable to start "flame-wars" (nasty episodes where people become
angry and hurl e-insults at each other), so broach them with great
care. One of them is vibrato (is it good, bad, authentic, etc).
Another is editing unpleasant texts by performers (should performers
remove offensive material). Yet another is <label>-specific
performing groups, where <label> is in {ethnic, gender, sexual
orientation, ...}. A lot of this may seem baffling to non-US readers
uncertain about the current state of American culture, and they may
need to ask a local familiar with the territory.ornamentation
When people communicate via screenfuls of text, tempers can
flare quickly. Each individual has his or her style, but a bit of
restraint can go a long way. Re-read your post if you have the time.
Humor is never in excess supply: a well-placed
smiley
can turn a comment from ambiguous to innocuous. Don't be afraid to post opinions,
but be prepared to see them contradicted. Do assert facts, but be
gracious when found in error. Try to make clear whether you are
offering fact or opinion (this may avoid a flame-war). Be gentle to
newcomers, once you are an old hand (remember, we all began somewhere).
whither my posts?
To an archive, actually,
maintained at the Economics University, Vienna, Austria. Everything
ever posted to this group is there, and there are tools to search the
archives for the occurrence of any string, or download messages by
time period. You can access it with Gopher , or with
FTP .
The Vienna archive technically only contains messages to the EM list. The
newsgroup itself is archived (like many others) automatically at
DejaNews. The DejaNews database only goes back to March 1995.
Miscellaneous
Spamming
Spamming is posting
the same message to many unrelated newsgroups. The
message is usually irrelevant to the newsgroups where it appears. This happens,
either because some firm thinks it's found a free form of advertising, or because some
nut thinks they've found a free soapbox. As the net grows, and more people come
on-line, this sort of thing is bound to happen.
The archetypal event was a posting offering legal services by two shysters called
Cantor and Siegel, whose names live down in infamy. Thousands of irate readers
replied to them, stuffing their mailbox with purposefully huge e-mails until
the system which housed their account crashed. This is called
mail-bombing, which is considered impolite.
The Cantor-Siegel incident was much publicized.
Commercial providers of Internet access now have a very good reason to
lay down extremely strict rules about spamming, since spamming by one of their
clients can bring down their system and seriously inconvenience all their clients
(that's why mail-bombing is both impolite and effective).
If spamming will bring about cancellation of the account, no commercial firm has
much interest in engaging in such, and commercial spamming will remain a rarity.
Kook spamming cannot be prevented the same way, it can only be repressed, and so
it must be endured as a consequence of the openness of the Net.
If r.m.e. is spammed, there is no need to follow-up with a post of your
own telling the world how bad spamming is, or how irrelevant that posting is.
We all know that. If you have specific and useful information ("Here's a
phone number to call to contact the sys-admin", "Don't bother, the offender's
account has already been shut down"), please post it. If you want to express
your outrage to the poster, reply to him or her; or send mail to the
sys-admin@ or postmaster@ the originating site. You may, however, rest
assured that many thousands of other users will have already sent e-mail.
François Velde
Johns Hopkins University
<velde@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>
Last modified: December 31, 1996